

*This list is reviewed annually and is based upon HINARI Core Offer Groups A and B, and the World Bank Country and Lending Groups.įor guidelines on policy and submission across our journals, please click on the links below:Īuthors are encouraged to carefully consider the keywords they select for their manuscripts in order to ensure that the most knowledgeable and qualified reviewers assess their work.

Please note that regardless of the funding situation, authors can still choose to publish with us at no cost, and articles will be made available to our subscribers.
#Take as needed for pain cover how to#
Visit our author hub to learn more about our waivers policy and how to request one.
#Take as needed for pain cover full#
(3) Are all the authors of your article based in low-income countries*? If so, you are eligible to apply for a full or partial waiver from BMJ. If neither (1) nor (2) above apply then consider (2) Have you received funding from a funder with an open access mandate or policy that covers paying APCs? If so, BMJ expects that the APC will be paid in full. Check BMJ’s open access agreements page to find out whether your institution is a member and what discounts you may be entitled to. (1) Does your institution have an open access agreement with BMJ? If it does, then this may cover all or part of the APC for your article. Please refer to our peer review terms and conditions policy page. For more information on what to expect during the peer review process please refer to BMJ Author Hub – the peer review process.īMJ requests that all reviewers adhere to a set of basic principles and standards during the peer-review process in research publication these are based on the COPE Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers. The journal operates single anonymised peer review whereby the names of the reviewers are hidden from the author Manuscripts authored by a member of a journal’s editorial team are independently peer reviewed an editor will have no input or influence on the peer review process or publication decision for their own article. The journal is not prepared to compromise on this stance. In most instances we aim for two external opinions (and often additional statistical assessment) for reasons of fairness and science. Articles submitted to Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine are subject to peer review.
